This document is a print friendly version of the page you wish to print.
close window
Nomad Wireless Briefing - Oct Nov 2006

Nomad Wireless Logo


 In this month's issue of the Nomad Wireless Briefing -
Oct Nov 2006:



  • The Value of Shared Services

  • Re-engineering for Shared Services

  • Technology Re-engineering for Shared Services




Nomad Wireless Briefing
IntroductionDescriptionPDFOffice
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - October/November 2006 A briefing to discuss: The Value of Shared Services; Re-Engineering for Shared Services; Technology Re-Engineering for Shared Services.

details | feedback


131.81Kb

1.47Mb
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - September/October 2006 A briefing to discuss: Unwiring the Local Authority; Building a Partnership to Deliver Wireless Public Services; Planning for a Hybrid Technical Architecture; Future of the Forum - Nomad Needs You

details | feedback


401.48Kb

1.77Mb
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - August 2006 A briefing to discuss: Wireless Technologies Supporting Business Value; Towards Transformative Government; Rural and Urban Wireless Solutions; Future of the Forum - Nomad Needs You

details | feedback


216.22Kb

1.97Mb
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - July 2006 A briefing to discuss: Wireless Infrastructure – Choosing the Right Business Model; Wireless Technology Choices; Preparing for Mobility – Mobile Application Characteristics; Future of the Forum – Nomad Wireless Needs You!

details | feedback


204.58Kb

2.03Mb
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - June 2006 A briefing to discuss: The Current Wireless Landscape; Wireless Technology - an Enabler of Shared Services; Wi-Fi and WiMAX for Beginners; Drivers for Wireless - Transferable, Scalable, Affordable, Replicable; The Digital Challenge.

details | feedback


174.04Kb

1.86Mb
The Value of Shared Services

Shared Services were popularised in the early 1990’s as a means of reducing the administrative cost of service delivery.  More recently shared services are run as Centres of Excellence, aligned with wider public policy goals and demonstrating optimal business processes. 

The shared services agenda represents a shift towards public bodies consolidating their back-offices and an aggregation of services across sectors such as health, education and police. 

Within the public sector much of the initial focus has been on finance and human resource functions but there are many other opportunities to consolidate functions and improve efficiency and effectiveness within local authorities. 

Through the use of new technologies Shared Service operators have generated significant economic benefits whilst also delivering process improvements and identifying new opportunities to generate value.

Shared Service Value Drivers

Shared Services have established their viability because they have created real and measurable value for organisations.  Increased productivity and lower administration costs are typical benefits and these have driven increased investment.  The following table outlines the four key value drivers of Shared Services.

Value Driver:  Economic Benefits
Description:  This refers to initiatives that are focussed on cost reduction due to better-managed processes or on increased revenues due to better collection mechanisms.

Value Driver:  Process Integrity
Description: 
As a consequence of implementing Shared Services, organisations have developed ‘best-practices’ towards their business processes, with standard approaches across different departments.  This makes it easier to manage and ensure compliance of operations.

Value Driver:  Business Value
Description:  Business value arises from improved use of technology, particularly data repositories that can share information across departments.  A solid infrastructure also allows opportunities to extend the service offering.

Value Driver:  Customer Satisfaction
Description:  The success of Shared Services is only really realised when citizens recognise the value of the Shared Service and participate at increasing levels with the service, further driving down costs, while delivering on the council service mandate.

As the Shared Service evolves, local authorities have to consider how they structure themselves to pursue all these types of value.  Some may choose to retain an infrastructure, independent of the Shared Service to focus on all types of value, while others may choose to focus solely on the Economic Benefits from cost reductions. 

Shared Service Experiences

Shared Services have created measurable and significant value for companies in terms of productivity but often at the cost of less tangible measures such as a local, personalised service.

Figure 1


 


 


 


 


 
Figure 1 - Shared Services Pro's and Con's

Services have largely delivered on the specific targets that were set out for them (See: Michael G. Markos, Experient Consulting).  These targets have been rooted in process, service and control and have resulted in well run organisations that can measure and track their improvements.

Customers, both employees and citizens, however, measure value in more intangible terms.  Both indicate that the service is not as good as it was.  Where service was once delivered within the community, now it is common to see cases such as Westminster outsourcing their revenue function to Blackburn.  Loss of decision-making authority and a disconnection from the operation of the shared service can undermine Local Authority employees and are threats to the long-term viability of the Shared Service centre.

A factor in the success of local authorities Shared Service initiatives will be ensuring that these difficult to measure ‘intangibles’ are not diminished in the drive for greater efficiencies.

RE-Engineering For Shared Services

Although the value of Shared Services is obvious on paper, it is not so trivial in practice to realise that value.   Local authorities have to factor in new partnerships, relationships and ways of collaborating in the context of different organisational motivations and impacts.

Process re-engineering and enhanced technology have been primary catalysts of huge productivity gains, enabling organisations to consolidate transaction processing and customer service operations.

Pillars of Shared Service

Shared Services offer a solution to local authorities wishing to improve productivity transparency and accountability through re-organisation of resources, roles and responsibilities.  Transitioning to shared services is most effective when it happens incrementally and each of the ‘pillars’ the following diagram are addressed.
Figure 2


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Figure 2 - Pillars of Shared Services

Effective Governance and strong leadership are characteristics of effective shared services providing the motivation and the mechanisms for keeping the partnership on track and ensuring there are sufficient resources to deliver on the objectives of the venture.

Shared Services introduce great change into an organisation.  These changes are often perceived as loss of control, confusion about transparency and a lack of clarity on new roles and responsibilities.  Managing this change requires that stakeholders (both internal and external) be effectively engaged and support is provided to help staff adapt to new working conditions.

The strength of relationships that managers foster between their customers, suppliers and staff will help to determine the long-term viability of the shared service and more importantly how effective it is in meeting new opportunities. 

Process / Organisational Re-Engineering

Rebuilding processes to be more effective, rather than simply aggregating functionality supports a Shared Service agenda.  Effective reengineering will reduce bureaucratic overheads, allowing people to concentrate on their core expertise and servicing their customers. 

An integral element of the Organisational Re-engineering model as pioneered by West Lancashire District Council’s Shared Contact Centre is to engage employees in the process and to transfer knowledge in-house via an action learning approach.

Figure 3


 


 


 


 


 


 


 Figure 3 - Re-Enginnering for Shared Services

The diagram above identifies some of the re-engineering techniques that might be employed in consolidating processes from two organisations together to deliver a shared service.

Data Collection is the first step in re-engineering processes and relates to processes and may also come from consultation as to what is required of the new processes.  Process mapping refers to documenting the way services are currently delivered.  At this stage the critical success factors are gathered to help determine what a successfully re-engineered process looks like.

Having gathered the required data, a critical analysis of the processes can be undertaken.  This is probably the most important step in that it forms the basis for development of improved processes based upon an examination of the current processes and how they can be optimised through a shared service model.  Employee Consultation can be used to incorporate the ideas of employees (or indeed customers) affected by these changes into the new processes.  This is a useful technique for building consensus and helping to ensure that all will support the new processes.

The final stage in the process is to benchmark the results of the analysis and to determine whether the reengineered processes match the best in class and whether they lend themselves to sustained improvements.  Benchmarking is a continuous process of measuring and assessing the services of public service leaders and incorporating the best practices into future enhancements of the process.

Technology Re-Engineering for Shared Services

Local authorities, organised vertically into separate departments, working with in-house business processes do not yield optimal organisational performance. The Shared Service agenda aims to address these challenges by building cross organisation service delivery based on integrated data, processes and cooperation.

Technological advances in computing and communications place IT, mobility and connectivity to back-office systems as important elements in realising this vision. However it is not a trivial challenge.  Integration between different systems necessitates a common understanding of standards, protocols and of course the objective to be achieved.

System Integration

Interoperability

The goal of interoperability is to enable independently developed systems to co-operate over a communications infrastructure. It allows different kinds of applications do what they do best, while supporting cross-organisational business processes. The complexity of the systems and applications to integrate will often dictate an adherence to standards and agreement on use of those standards so that the systems can operate in consort.

Integration requirements such as authentication and session management are typically centralised to service all of the integrated systems. Web services or off-the-shelf brokering technologies may be employed to handle cross-language integration problems. Data integration will be required where data is collated from multiple different systems.

Departments and external customers (vendors, businesses and citizens) have many different requirements and a wide variety of standards and systems. Typically, this includes proprietary, custom and in-house developed systems. Occasionally these systems require integration with legacy systems that prevent the use of more modern and simpler approaches to integration.


Consider the following interoperability best practices when integrating systems:




  • Design using object and services modelling techniques

  • Use technology independent techniques whenever possible

  • Build common dictionaries using metadata to describe system data and entities

  • Use mature and stable standards

  • Use gateways and protocol converters to resolve protocol mismatches.


Standards

Shared services integration is business-to-business integration (B2B), where the applications from one organisation directly interconnect with the applications of other organisation across a shared network. Interoperability is key and a lack of appropriate standards makes integration difficult and costly if not impossible.

Choosing standardised technologies over proprietary ones helps to safeguard your investment by providing a solid roadmap for the future and because the software/equipment is not vendor-specific, the Local Authority can shop around for products and costs that best suit their requirements.

It is important that local authorities strike a balance between components of the integrated systems that are rigidly standardised and those that are flexible enough to allow for innovation and tailored implementation by the different stakeholders and users within and outside the organisation. For example, a particular department may have significant investment in a proprietary data storage technology.  It may prove less expensive to integrate that system than try enforce large-scale redevelopment to meet a particular standard.

At the application integration layer, there are a number of existing and emerging standards. Internet-based technologies, such as TCP/IP, HTML, are prevalent in the networking world and have become de facto standards. eXtensible Markup Language (XML) and Web services are also becoming ubiquitous and fall into the same category. XML defines a common alphabet for constructing words and documents that enable conversations between applications to take place. The emerging family of Web services standards such as Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) and Web Services Description Language (WSDL) are conventions for passing XML documents between applications. While XML is relatively established, Web services are still emerging and XML document-passing conventions can still be highly proprietary. 

Often, the network infrastructure is not discussed as part of the integration effort. However, it is important that minimal requirements of throughput, Quality of Service (QoS), reliability and performance are agreed between the Local Authority and external stakeholders. These requirements will be determined according to the characteristics of the services that are to be enabled over the infrastructure.

At the network infrastructure level, Wi-Fi, WiMAX, 3G and HSDPA (or 3.5G) are the prevalent standardised technologies. The major operational differentiators between these technologies are throughput, range and capacity for mobility. Also, the level of maturity of the associated standards, the product roadmaps for each technology and regulatory issues around licensed spectrum allocation must be factored into the selection process for the local authority. Each standard has been designed with a particular use in mind, so the technology choice will be guided by project requirements.  Each standard is optimised as follows:



  • 3G - for cellular voice and moderate data-rate applications

  • WiMAX - for mobile internet and IP services

  • HSDPA (or 3.5G) for data services over cellular networks.


The local authority should look at implementing a standardised network infrastructure. Given budget and timeline restrictions, integration may be required with existing pre-standard or proprietary equipment but this should be minimised. 

Security

In their shared services initiatives, local authorities must make provision to protect their own data and the privacy and confidentiality of their networked transactions and those of their customers and partners. This has to be addressed both at the infrastructure and the application layers. The following characteristics of a shared services infrastructure and current environmental trends further underline the necessity to properly address these challenges:




  • Greater levels of integration with a variety of business entities both internally and externally

  • Increased use of open systems based infrastructures

  • The integration of existing or “legacy” systems with future systems

  • Growing sophistication and complexity of integrated distributed computing systems 

  • Growing sophistication of rogue hackers and the criminal community.


Security must be planned into the integrated systems at the reengineering design phase. Planning for security, in advance of deployment, will provide a more complete and cost effective solution and will ensure that security services are supportable.

Security is not a once-off exercise but rather an ever-evolving process.  It takes continual work and education to help the security processes keep up with the demands that will be placed on the systems.  By definition there are no communications systems that are 100% secure. Residual risks must therefore be taken into account and managed. In particular, local authorities should focus to how best to secure confidential data and transactions insofar as is technologically possible in their shared services environment. Further, they should set out a policy of ongoing risk assessment with actions plans and risk mitigation strategies for any security shortcomings. 


Increased use of open systems based infrastructures
Use technology independent techniques whenever possible
Future of the Nomad Wireless Forum
The Nomad Wireless Forum aim is to develop the local government agenda for wireless in order to help local authorities make the right decisions when developing and implementing outdoor wireless broadband networks.

The Forum brings together stakeholders from around the UK, including representatives from local authorities, technology partners and academia, to accelerate the adoption of wireless Internet to support social and economic development and better-managed cities, communities and regions. The Forum is an environment to foster dialogue among key decision makers from all groups.

But we need your help... In order for us to continue development of the Forum, we need your support and input, to identify your organisations’ needs and drivers, best practice and case studies focusing on the challenges local authorities face when deploying such networks. These challenges may range from; achieving buy-in of the concept internally; proving the business case stacks up; or understanding the technology choices available.

The Nomad Wireless agenda is focused on drawing out the tangible benefits that participants expect to derive from the take up of outdoor wireless broadband networks.

There has been successful participation in the Nomad Wireless Forum meetings so far, especially from leading technology equipment vendors, service providers, and systems integrators.

As part of an effort to further the dialogue and progress made in sharing win-win solutions we need to identify the champion local authorities that wish to drive this agenda forward and shape the wireless strategy for local authorities with Nomad Wireless.

Would your local authority be willing to play a pro-active role in the wireless forum over the next year and maintain close contact with the critical suppliers shaping this market within local government?

For more infomation:
Contact Bharat Jain, Project Manager, London Connects
E: bharat.jain@londonconnects.gov.uk
T: 0208 921 5131 / 07951 206 055
IntroductionDescriptionPDFOffice
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - October/November 2006 A briefing to discuss: The Value of Shared Services; Re-Engineering for Shared Services; Technology Re-Engineering for Shared Services.

details | feedback


131.81Kb

1.47Mb
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - September/October 2006 A briefing to discuss: Unwiring the Local Authority; Building a Partnership to Deliver Wireless Public Services; Planning for a Hybrid Technical Architecture; Future of the Forum - Nomad Needs You

details | feedback


401.48Kb

1.77Mb
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - August 2006 A briefing to discuss: Wireless Technologies Supporting Business Value; Towards Transformative Government; Rural and Urban Wireless Solutions; Future of the Forum - Nomad Needs You

details | feedback


216.22Kb

1.97Mb
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - July 2006 A briefing to discuss: Wireless Infrastructure – Choosing the Right Business Model; Wireless Technology Choices; Preparing for Mobility – Mobile Application Characteristics; Future of the Forum – Nomad Wireless Needs You!

details | feedback


204.58Kb

2.03Mb
The Nomad Wireless Briefing - June 2006 A briefing to discuss: The Current Wireless Landscape; Wireless Technology - an Enabler of Shared Services; Wi-Fi and WiMAX for Beginners; Drivers for Wireless - Transferable, Scalable, Affordable, Replicable; The Digital Challenge.

details | feedback


174.04Kb

1.86Mb